After a frenetic attempt to count every high-needs student in the California public school system, the first official tally nether the sweeping new K-12 finance law is in – and the results are mixed.

In iii of the v largest school districts, the number of students who stand to benefit from the law is lower than expected, a consequence, some say, of inflated estimates, complicated data requirements and insufficient efforts to collect paperwork from parents.

"Districts are going to have a selection: Are we willing to exist OK with being somewhat undercounted every year, or are we actually going attempt to develop an outreach strategy upfront?" said Oscar Cruz, president of Families In Schools, a Los Angeles-based nonprofit organisation that works to increment parent involvement in schools.

The long-anticipated counts determine the amount of extra state education funding districts receive this fiscal year and next, and offering a window into how well schools are meeting another goal of the new Local Command Funding Formula – reaching out to families of high-needs students, defined as low-income, English learners or foster youth.

In an breezy survey, the Los Angeles, San Diego and Elk Grove unified districts said that their actual counts of loftier-needs students fell compared to projections used in 2013-fourteen budget calculations by the California Department of Finance.

FRACFoodHardshipRate

U.S. Food Hardship Rate in 2010-2011 by Congressional District. Graphic by Food Enquiry and Action Center

On the other manus, in the unified districts of Long Beach and Fresno, the actual counts of high-needs students rose compared to projections. The state has non yet released the actual counts of high-needs students for all districts.

"At that place is real debate most whether in that location are undercounts at some schools," said Kim Pattillo Brownson, director of educational equity at Advancement Projection, a Los Angeles-based nonprofit public policy group.

In Los Angeles, some parents balked at filling out newly created income verification forms because they feared the data would be turned over to clearing officials, she said. "The question is do yous penalize children because their parents are uncertain of their immigration status?" Brownson asked.

That concern is real, said Valerie Cuevas, acting executive director at The Educational activity Trust-W, an Oakland-based nonprofit advocacy group. But, she added, "The folks that probably accept an effect with the counts are probably the folks who didn't do a skillful job."

Under the new finance constabulary, districts can receive additional funds for every high-needs student enrolled – equally much every bit $three,000 per student once the formula is fully funded over the next eight years.

The law, which took effect July one, is a signature reform of Gov. Jerry Brown's administration and aims to deliver substantially more than money to schools that serve big numbers of disadvantaged students. But data collection, never simple for a land with more 6 1000000 students, became contentious last summer as the California Department of Education required districts to collect new paperwork from thousands of low-income families.

High-poverty schools

Much of the difficulty occurred in an cabalistic subset of schools that operate under what's known as Provision 2 of the National School Lunch Programme, said officials in the five largest districts. These are generally schools where more than 80 percentage of students qualify for gratis and reduced-price meals.

Little known outside the world of school nutrition, the Provision 2 schools became a battleground. While the new funding formula defines students as "low- income" if they are eligible for the free meals program, the authors of the constabulary neglected to specifically address how to count students at one,500 Provision ii schools, where all students receive gratis meals whether they are eligible or not.

SchoolsnackOaklandJA-2013

A count of students who are eligible for the school meals program is the foundation of the new school finance reform. This Oakland student enjoys a snack provided past the meals plan. Photo Credit: EdSource Today/ Jane Meredith Adams

Every bit office of a federal paperwork reduction endeavour, these high-poverty schools plant income eligibility for gratuitous meals in a "base year" survey no more than every 4 years. In exchange for being relieved of costly accounting procedures, districts pay the difference between the actual number of students qualified to receive costless meals and 100 pct.

But the California Section of Instruction said that for purposes of the new funding formula, all schools had to provide almanac data about depression-income students, English learners and foster youth.

This put the loftier-poverty schools up against federal restrictions. Nether federal law, the schools had to create new income verification forms that made no mention of the costless lunch plan. And they could not utilise money from the luncheon program to pay for distributing, collecting and logging data for the new funding formula.

"Nosotros've all learned a lot near Provision 2 schools," said Andrea Ball, legislative abet for the California School Boards  Association.

Less paperwork next year?

But a move to ease the paperwork requirements for these high-poverty schools is already afoot. In response to complaints from Los Angeles, San Diego, Fresno and other districts, equally well as from school lunch advocates, Chocolate-brown proposed data-collection relief measures, which must be approved by the state Legislature.

Under Brown's proposal, instead of collecting individual pupil data from every family each yr, this subset of schools could meet the requirements of the funding formula by performing a comprehensive census every iv years. In the interim years, the schools would collect information just from entering students.

In a drive to collect the necessary forms at the loftier-poverty schools, some districts launched raffles, held ice cream parties and sent parents door to door. Yet zeal for the job varied. Los Angeles Unified, which has the largest number of students in these high-poverty schools, lagged in its efforts to collect the paperwork, in part because information technology spent months trying to get an exemption from the requirement. In a December news release, the district announced that information technology was embarking on the "nightmare" of collecting more than 138,000 paper applications.

As it turned out, the actual count in Los Angeles Unified determined that 81 percent of the students in the district were verified equally loftier-needs, compared to the projected count of 86 percent. San Diego Unified said its high-needs pupil count was 4 percent points lower – 63 percent in an actual count versus 67 pct in the projected count. In Elk Grove Unified, the count was 3 percentage points lower, with the actual tally of high-needs students coming in at 56 percent compared to the projected count of 59 percent.

As a consequence, Los Angeles, San Diego and Elk Grove volition receive less state money than expected for 2013-fourteen, in funds even so to be dispersed, and the lower count volition be used to determine funding for 2014-fifteen.

On the other paw, Long Embankment Unified said information technology identified more high-needs students – seventy pct in an actual count versus 68 percent in the projected count. Fresno said information technology also identified more high-needs students – 87 percent in an bodily count compared to 86 percent in the projected count. Funding for the Long Beach and Fresno districts volition correspondingly increase.

Merely the state projections were e'er but that – projections – and districts have been cautioned throughout the year non to programme on revenue until their counts of high-needs students have been completed, said Carrie Hahnel, manager of enquiry and policy analysis at The Education Trust-West.

"The estimates were rosy," Hahnel said. "At that place was no disclosure of the assumptions used in creating them."

Amidst those assumptions was counting 100 percent of students at Provision two schools equally low-income, even though bodily base of operations yr tallies showed that the number of students qualified for the free luncheon program ranged from 80 to 100 percent at individual schools.

Officials in the Los Angeles and Elk Grove districts said the lower than expected funding won't cause a shortfall in 2013-xiv because they worked from a conservative upkeep.

But San Diego Unified has a $3.2 one thousand thousand shortfall in the current year considering it budgeted for, and spent, money based on the state Department of Finance guess that 67 percent of students would qualify equally high-needs, said Martha Alvarez, director of government relations for the district.

Instead, the actual count came in at 63 percent.

"Don't penalize u.s. for not getting all of the forms in," Alvarez said.

San Diego Unified is request the country to "hold harmless" the district for the discrepancy and fund the 2013-14 budget at the 67 pct rate of high-needs students, Alvarez said.

But Chocolate-brown did not include a "hold harmless" provision in changes he proposed in his May revised budget. Alvarez said she was disappointed.

Fresno leads in collecting the data

Fresno Unified appears to have outpaced all other large districts by collecting income verification forms from 99.v percent of its students, said Ruth Quinto, chief financial officeholder of the district. The campaign was led by Tammy Townsend, the district's executive officer for land and federal programs, and conducted with "precision" and "conclusion," Quinto said.

Collecting information from students at the high-poverty schools collection up the terminal count, she said. "It was a huge effort, and in the end it increased the number of students eligible for free and reduced priced lunch," Quinto said.

In Long Beach Unified, success in collecting forms from high-poverty schools seemed to vary, in part, by the amount of effort given the task, said Christopher Lund, director of the commune's Office of Research, Planning and Evaluation.

"The principals that took that on and took information technology seriously had significant results," he said.

Other schools weren't as persistent or thorough in contacting parents and collecting income verification forms, and as a result lost funding, Lund said. "Ane school came in 17 percent less than its base of operations year and that school did receive significantly less funds because of it," he said.

Adjacent yr, Lund said, the research part of Long Embankment Unified will take on the task of collecting the income verification forms, which have been redesigned into a class with two "bubbles" for families to fill in: one for number of household members and one for income.

The class will have a bar code that links it to an private student. Instead of manually inbound the information, the forms will be scanned into the system and uploaded to the country pupil data drove site.

"Information technology'south going to streamline the system," Lund said.

Jane Meredith Adams covers student health. Contact her  or follow her @JaneAdams . Sign up here  for EdHealth, EdSource Today'due south free newsletter on student health.

To get more reports like this one, click here to sign upwardly for EdSource'south no-cost daily email on latest developments in pedagogy.